Showing posts with label Novel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Novel. Show all posts

7/14/2014

The Object of Power is Power: A 5 Star Review of 1984 by George Orwell




Freedom is freedom to say that two plus two makes four. If that is granted, everything else follows.

Winston Smith lives in post-World War II era, where there are three super powers in the world, Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia, and most of the land of the world belongs to them. Winston belongs to The Party, which rules Oceania but only as a member of the outer body and works in the Ministry of Truth, writing, rewriting and re-rewriting history as demanded by The Party. To be the member of The Party implies three things for him:

1.       Big Brother is always watching you.
2.       You have no power, thought, purpose or will as an individual.
3.       But if you consider yourself to be really a part of The Party so much so that you think you ARE The Party, you own everything in Oceania and you are as good as indestructible.

Unfortunately for Winston, he does not consider himself to be really a part of The Party. Instead, he considers himself to be an enemy of The Party. Consequently, he regularly takes part in all sorts of “thought crimes” including remembering the past as it was and not as The Party says it was, falling in love with a woman, Julia, and pursuing the possibility of courting her, planning to join a rebel underground group bent on destroying The Party and believing that indeed The Party can be destroyed. However, there is only one outcome of such crimes in Oceania: a trip to the Ministry of Love. 

1984 is by far the worst book I have ever read! Don’t get me wrong, this is still a 5-star review. What makes 1984 the worst book in the history of all my book reading is not that the book is terribly written. Instead, it is the exact opposite. George Orwell writes dystopia as it is meant to be written: haunting, disturbing and downright nightmarish. Reading Part III was especially difficult for me. I could not read more than a few pages at a time, because I was just so disturbed. The torture inflicted in the Ministry of Love does not make you cry out tears for Winston and it does not make you sad or distraught. Actually, you end up feeling nothing for Winston, but horrified at the possibility of such things happening to you. It the mother of all nightmares coming to life, where you are safe nowhere, not even inside your own head, because The Party, for its own safekeeping, will get inside it if need be. The Party will make you love who it wills and hate who it wills, it will make 2 + 2 = 5, even if you know in your head that there is no way that it can be anything other than 4. It will change the past because it owns the past. The Party doesn’t only have the power to change the past in the records, but it even has the power to change it in your memories, because it controls everything- the records and your memory.

Oceania is not just the epitome of totalitarianism, but it is a step ahead of it! By mastering doublethink, a process by which you can hold two contradictory things true in your mind, it has not only taken control of the land, the people and the resources but also has taken control of the course of history and the memories and emotions of the inhabitants of Oceania. The Party from time to time changes its allies from Eurasia to Eastasia and then back to Eurasia leaving the third its enemy in war. However, in the records of Oceania and in the minds of the people of Oceania The Party has only ever been at war with one of them. Whenever The Party changes its alliance from one to the other, it simply changes all the records to match the new enemy. Winston remembers that Oceania had been at war with Eurasia only about four years ago and had been in alliance with Eastasia, however, all “sane” party members know, remember and believe that, “No, Oceania is at war with Eastasia. It has always been at war with Eastasia.” If only yesterday, The Party again betrays Eurasia and declares war on Eurasia, all “sane” party members will remember that, “Oceania is at war with Eurasia. It has always been at war with Eurasia.” Only Winston’s “insanity” believes in a reality that is physically separated from the mind of The Party and that needs to “cured.”

One of the most intriguing parts of the novel is the three slogans that arise from The Party’s ideology, “Ingsoc.”


1.      WAR IS PEACE: The relevance of this slogan may be felt from the beginning of time to perhaps the end of time for the human race. War has been the only constant throughout history. Conflict has remained ingrained in societies no matter how much they try to curb it. As Plato once said quite wisely, “Only the dead have seen the end of war.” Mr. Orwell takes advantage of his dystopian world and looks deeper into the meaning of constant war. He insinuates that war is necessary to maintain peace. War is essential to ensure that all surplus production of a powerful country is not used to eradicate class structure in the world. War is essential to dump that surplus in the form of destruction and devastation. War is essential for constant power, whether it is for a class of people, a mindset, an organization or even an ideology. WAR IS PEACE.

As Orwell says, "A peace that was truly permanent would be the same as a permanent war." Orwell understands that peace within a community can only remain when its people remain completely loyal to the ruling authority. To ensure that, there needs to be an enormous threat on the outside from whom the ruling authority is constantly protecting them through a never-ending war. Only in such a state of affairs will the people be focused too well on the external threat that they will not dream to rise up to become an internal one.

2.       FREEDOM IS SLAVERY: Nothing could explain this slogan better than O’Brien who says that the truth is that “Slavery is freedom. Alone – free – the human being is always defeated.” The individual can never be more than a body travelling towards its death. The individual is “doomed to die,” and O’Brien dubs that as “the greatest of all failures.” Orwell is bringing out the truth in human need for submission, whether it is to a promise beyond the grave, their work before the grave, an ideology, a hobby or even another human being. Alone, a human being is nothing more than a forgettable entity that as good as ceases to exist the moment it drops dead. However, “if he can make complete, utter submission, if he can escape from his identity,” he can become something more. Nevertheless, as everything has a price, this is priced at the individual’s freedom. O’Brien reiterates the meaning of being a party member by saying that “if he (an individual) can merge himself in the Party so that he is the Party, then he is all-powerful and immortal.” The Party believes its ideology to be eternal and everlasting. Any member of that ideology will consequently be eternal. However, they shall also be eternally enslaved.

3.       IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH: The simplest of the three, is perhaps also the most deep rooted of all the slogans of The Party. “The Book”, apparently written by Goldstein, begins with the ever-known fact that “Throughout recorded time, and probably since the end of the Neolithic Age, there have been three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle and the Low.” Goldstein gives insight into the true nature of the three classes. He shows us that the High always want to remain where they are, the Middle want to overthrow the High and take their places and the Low, whenever they are not so caught up in trying to survive, being at the very bottom of the Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, wish for equality. However, the Low are also the only ones who are “never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims.” They always end up being used by the Middle attracted to their so called slogans of “freedom, justice and fraternity,” only to be “thrust” back down “into their old position of servitude” after the Middle have achieved their aims.

This internal struggle ultimately leads to instability of power within a land and a never-ending cycle of power switching results. In order to counter this The Party realizes that it needs to freeze the classes. The Party does this by learning from the position of the Low. The Low never have enough resources, time, will or energy to think anything through. They are always caught up in the acts of survival. The Party induces a state of ignorance in all the three classes in Oceania by thrusting them to the basest level of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. There is never enough of anything in the market, what is available is terrible to eat and almost always artificial, shelter has been transformed into a place of constant surveillance, sex has been made undesirable and forbidden, family lives have been poisoned with the children betraying their parents and parents afraid of their own little ones and security is a concept unknown to all.

In such state of affairs, who would dream of thinking of equality, liberty, justice or anything apart from survival? Only a few. The Party ensures that those few are also taken care of. In order for anyone to rise against their current condition of existence, they usually need something to compare it to. If the comparison is the Past, The Party controls it to no end, with its ideology of doublethink and constant “fixing” of “misquoted” facts. The Past does not exist in Oceania but as a confirmation of the Present. Therefore, there is no comparison in the past.

If it is a matter of comparison with another community then The Party ensures that the people of Oceania never lay eyes on any part or any person of either Eurasia or Eastasia. Lastly, if the comparison is in their heads, in their whims and their wishes, then The Party “cures” them in the Ministry of Love before annihilating their very existence! Ignorance is strength, because it ensures that no one knows any better than what is, because what is was always what was and what was is nothing more than what is.

Everything in Oceania is diseased but Winston still realized in the midst of all the disease a profound truth. “There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.” But with The Party you were not even safe inside of your own head. To get you to accept their untruth they would go to the lengths of ensuring you were mad. The Party would make you believe that their lies were truth. It would make you unknow what you know and know what you wish to unknow.

The Party’s disease plagues everything, not only the goodness of truth but also the sanctity of love. Winston tells Julia that betrayal would not be to confess, because everyone ends up confessing in the end to what they have done and more. He says that real betrayal would be that if The Party could somehow make him stop loving her. However, Julia naively states that they could not do that, “They can make you say anything - anything - but they can’t make you believe it. They can’t get inside you.” If only someone told her that not only could they do that, but they would do that. And so they both betray one another in the Ministry of Love and as that thought bleeds into Winston’s mind at the end of his story, a voice sings in his head,

“Under the spreading chestnut tree
I sold you and you sold me-“

One might wonder the purpose of such extreme measures and they are simply this, “One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes a revolution in order to establish a dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.”


It is true that 1984 is one of the worst things that I have ever read but, in the true spirit of doublethink, that does not prevent it from being one of the best as well. If it were possible I would have given it 6 out of 5 stars! ;) 

7/03/2013

INFERNO- A 4 star review


Reading Dan Brown’s “Inferno” was a true roller coaster! Where should I begin?

Robert Langdon wakes up in a hospital room thinking that it is Monday and that a few minutes ago he was in strolling down the corridors of Harvard. However, he soon discovers that it is indeed Saturday, he is not anywhere near Harvard, much less the United States, he has a strange looking bio-hazard device in his possession and a woman is out to kill him! What’s more, Langdon has no recollection of the events that may have led him into this situation!

There are Spoilers ahead, so be warned my friend, BE WARNED! =P =P

Dan Brown has finally managed to write a thriller which was not only unpredictable but completely and utterly baffling! There was only one aspect of the thriller that I was able to get a grasp on and that was that Sienna was somehow involved in all of the drama that was going on. However, the way that she was involved was way off from my guess. For this purpose alone I give Mr. Brown’s “Inferno” a rating higher than even his best work to date, “The Da Vinci Code”.

The most intriguing aspect of the thriller was that once again Dan Brown manages to weave his story with strands of fiction and reality so closely woven that sometimes you are unable to separate the two. Tidbits about literature, history, artwork and science not only provides a strong basis for making it possible to intricately merge reality with fiction, but also enables the reader to gain some general knowledge about these areas.

Another thing that really stands out is the commitment Dan Brown shows towards a pressing global issue: Overpopulation. It is true that the world’s population is completely out of control and no one seems to be really ‘DOING’ anything about it. This theme runs strong throughout the novel till the very end, when it is discovered that Zobrist’s solution to the problem was hardly dramatic. It is funny how no one seems to point out the obvious flaws in his real solution too:

1. It is like playing God: Randomly rendering 1/3rd of the population infertile hardly seems appropriate. What if the other 2/3rd of the population are not fit to be parents or do not have good genes to pass on? (I know crude but still I wondered =S)
2. It is just plain cruel: Dr. Sinskey’s argument that what if Nature’s solution to overpopulation this time was not to bring about floods, famine or plagues. Instead, Nature used evolution to result in the birth of Dr. Zobrist-a genius who would provide a solution to the problem and go on to take matters in his own hands. My answer to that is simply:



Blaming a man’s actions, whose genetics only defines 60% of his actions and lifestyle, on nature is hardly playing fair. She should have simply said:



this would have been more appropriate…

Nevertheless, one has to admit that Bertrand Zobrist DID provide a solution, A REAL SOLUTION to the overpopulation problem. =/

I swore that this was going to be my last Dan Brown novel in case I discovered even a single piece of the puzzle. I suppose, now, I’d have to read his upcoming books to regain my reputation of knowing before Dan Brown reveals… LOL… =D